Science/Experiments 

There have been many scientific experiments that prove we live on a motionless, curveless plane. 

But who needs REAL science when you’ve got masonic theories and NASA cartoons telling and showing us otherwise?  

You’ll trust Mr. MC2 over these science experiments since you’ve never heard of them! 

They don’t seem to find their way into your Rockefeller-founded and funded general education board textbooks.  

I wonder why?

  

Eratosthenes “PROVED” the earth was spherical thousands of years ago by a simple stick and shadow experiment. 

Did you know that the SAME experiment works on a flat plane with a local sun?  

The things they never mention in our indoctrination camp we call school.

These guys break down the stick and shadow experiment into extreme detail proving the same experiment works on a flat plane with a local sun.

Airys Failure

This experiment is a devastating blow to the heliocentric theory.  This proved it was the luminaries moving and not the earth.  

Sagnac’s experiment proved the existence of the aether, thus demolishing Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.

The Michelson-Gale experiment detected the passing of the aether across the surface of the Earth within 2.6% accuracy of the calculated value of 1 revolution per day. This video shows the scientific methodology behind the experiment and how it was physically carried out by passing light in opposite directions around 12-inch diameter tubes laid out in a large rectangle in a field.

Michelson-Morley

This experiment failed to detect any motion the earth had around the sun.

The Bedford Level experiment proved there’s no curvature over 6 miles. 

Here’s a little experiment anyone can do.  You can make the sun set across a flat surface.

Another experiment you can do yourself.  

This proves the sun is local.

This is a ball buster.

If sunlight was indeed reflected off the moon as we’ve been fed, that light would HAVE to be WARMER in its direct path than in the shadow.  

That’s not the case though!  When measuring the temperature, the moonlight is actually COLDER in its direct path than in its shadow.

You ball huggers may want to grab some tissues for this one.

Solar eclipse to scale.  Can we make the shadow  of the moon SMALLER like in the heliocentric model?

A simple experiment that debunks the heliocentric theory.

The rotation speed at the equator would HAVE to be rotating faster than at the poles on a spinning ball.

When observing the stars from the equator AND the poles, we see no difference.

So how do you explain this anomaly?

Just add it to the others and look the other way.

  

A spirit level doesn’t lie